Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California » 2019 » Quiz 5
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here
Question #1
What provision of the Fourteenth Amendment serves as a cornerstone of struggles to win equality for certain groups?
A.
the all men are created equal clause
B.
the Equal Rights Amendment
C.
the privileges and immunities clause
D.
the equal protection clause
Question #2
What rationale did the Supreme Court rely on when deciding that segregation in transportation was permissible in Plessy v. Ferguson?
A.
Jim Crow laws helped African Americans to achieve equality by building character through overcoming adversity.
B.
Segregation in public facilities was not unconstitutional as long as the separate facilities were substantially equal.
C.
The equal protection clause applied only to the actions of the federal government, not to actions of private businesses and individuals.
D.
Segregation was important for maintaining social order, a prerequisite for racial equality.
Question #3
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court declared that African Americans were __________.
A.
separate but equal
B.
citizens
C.
eligible to vote
D.
property or chattel
Question #4
School busing policies were designed to overcome __________.
A.
de facto segregation
B.
the refusal of African Americans to attend school with whites
C.
freedom rides
D.
de jure segregation
Question #5
What did the Supreme Court determine was unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education?
A.
school busing
B.
school segregation
C.
school integration
D.
unequal school funding
Question #6
What strategy did the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) successfully use to fight against school segregation?
A.
boycotts
B.
litigation
C.
protests
D.
marches and rallies
Question #7
After Reconstruction, which of the following was used to prevent African Americans from having a meaningful impact on the outcome of elections?
A.
white primaries
B.
majority-minority districts
C.
Jim Crow laws
D.
affirmative action
Question #8
Which of the following is an example of de jure segregation?
A.
the tendency for churches to be racially homogeneous
B.
the small number of African American senators
C.
sequestering the jury in order to ensure a fair trial
D.
Jim Crow laws
Question #9
How are the Supreme Court decisions in Korematsu v. United States (1944) and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) similar?
A.
Both decisions upheld important constitutional principles.
B.
Both decisions were important early victories in the struggle for civil rights.
C.
Both decisions limited the civil rights of racial or ethnic minorities.
D.
Both decisions were positive turning points in the history of American jurisprudence.
Question #10
Why did Congress pass the Voting Rights Act of 1965?
A.
the Supreme Court had determined that only the national government could regulate elections
B.
because it was clear that many areas in the South had no intention of living up to the spirit of the Fifteenth Amendment
C.
to prevent the race riots from spreading from African American neighborhoods into traditionally white neighborhoods
D.
because Congress was afraid the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. would lead a boycott of white businesses if the legislation was not passed
Question #11
What was the Supreme Court's justification in Brown v. Board of Education?
A.
The separate-but-equal doctrine was never intended to apply to people.
B.
The Supreme Court did not have all of the facts when it adopted the separate-but-equal doctrine.
C.
The quality of life for African Americans in the South had deteriorated considerably since the adoption of the separate-but-equal doctrine.
D.
School segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.
Question #12
Which of the following does the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ban?
A.
racial discrimination in public accommodations
B.
nonviolent resistance
C.
discrimination based on sexual orientation
D.
poll taxes and grandfather clauses
Question #13
When did women across the country achieve the constitutionally guaranteed right to vote?
A.
during the Civil War
B.
immediately after the Civil War
C.
at the same time that black males won the right to vote
D.
decades after black males won the right to vote
Question #14
The Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) primarily enhanced the civil liberties of __________.
A.
disabled Americans
B.
American Indians
C.
gays and lesbians
D.
Asian Americans
Question #15
In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court determined that __________ were unconstitutional.
A.
racial quotas in university admissions
B.
grandfather clauses
C.
Jim Crow laws
D.
all forms of affirmative action
Question #16
If a group of people were systematically discriminated against in the past, which of the following would constitute an affirmative action policy designed as a remedy to help the members of this group overcome this legacy of discrimination?
A.
a college admissions policy that gives preferential treatment to members of the group
B.
a color-blind job application process to give members of this group an equal chance
C.
a hiring policy that favors those with relatives working in government
D.
requiring that all job applicants have at least two years of prior experience
Question #17
Which of the following affirmative action programs would be a clear violation of the Supreme Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)?
A.
admitting some minority applicants with lower academic achievement than some rejected white applicants
B.
considering race as a factor in university admissions decisions
C.
considering how an applicant would contribute to the diversity of the university
D.
setting aside a certain percentage of admissions slots for African American students
Question #18
What is the status of affirmative action in college admissions after the Supreme Court decisions in the two cases involving the University of Michigan, Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)?
A.
All forms of affirmative action are unconstitutional because they unfairly favor some people over others based on the color of their skin.
B.
Affirmative action policies are assumed to be unconstitutional unless the university can demonstrate the need to promote racial tolerance.
C.
Affirmative action policies must ensure that all racial and ethnic groups are represented in accordance with the population of the nation as a whole.
D.
Affirmative action policies are generally permissible, but they cannot involve race-based quotas or numerical point systems.
Question #19
Which of the following arguments would most likely be made by an opponent of affirmative action policies?
A.
Unaddressed past discrimination causes perpetual inequality.
B.
Discrimination is a natural part of the human experience.
C.
Affirmative action discriminates on the basis of race.
D.
Diversity helps Americans better understand each other.
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here