Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California » 2019 » Quiz 5
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here
Question #1
What provision of the Fourteenth Amendment serves as a cornerstone of struggles to win equality for certain groups?
A.
the all men are created equal clause
B.
the Equal Rights Amendment
C.
the equal protection clause
D.
the privileges and immunities clause
Question #2
What rationale did the Supreme Court rely on when deciding that segregation in transportation was permissible in Plessy v. Ferguson?
A.
Jim Crow laws helped African Americans to achieve equality by building character through overcoming adversity.
B.
Segregation in public facilities was not unconstitutional as long as the separate facilities were substantially equal.
C.
Segregation was important for maintaining social order, a prerequisite for racial equality.
D.
The equal protection clause applied only to the actions of the federal government, not to actions of private businesses and individuals.
Question #3
In Dred Scott v. Sandford, the Supreme Court declared that African Americans were __________.
A.
citizens
B.
separate but equal
C.
property or chattel
D.
eligible to vote
Question #4
School busing policies were designed to overcome __________.
A.
de facto segregation
B.
the refusal of African Americans to attend school with whites
C.
de jure segregation
D.
freedom rides
Question #5
What did the Supreme Court determine was unconstitutional in Brown v. Board of Education?
A.
school integration
B.
school busing
C.
unequal school funding
D.
school segregation
Question #6
What strategy did the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) successfully use to fight against school segregation?
A.
litigation
B.
marches and rallies
C.
boycotts
D.
protests
Question #7
After Reconstruction, which of the following was used to prevent African Americans from having a meaningful impact on the outcome of elections?
A.
Jim Crow laws
B.
majority-minority districts
C.
white primaries
D.
affirmative action
Question #8
Which of the following is an example of de jure segregation?
A.
sequestering the jury in order to ensure a fair trial
B.
the tendency for churches to be racially homogeneous
C.
Jim Crow laws
D.
the small number of African American senators
Question #9
How are the Supreme Court decisions in Korematsu v. United States (1944) and Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) similar?
A.
Both decisions were positive turning points in the history of American jurisprudence.
B.
Both decisions were important early victories in the struggle for civil rights.
C.
Both decisions upheld important constitutional principles.
D.
Both decisions limited the civil rights of racial or ethnic minorities.
Question #10
Why did Congress pass the Voting Rights Act of 1965?
A.
to prevent the race riots from spreading from African American neighborhoods into traditionally white neighborhoods
B.
because Congress was afraid the Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. would lead a boycott of white businesses if the legislation was not passed
C.
the Supreme Court had determined that only the national government could regulate elections
D.
because it was clear that many areas in the South had no intention of living up to the spirit of the Fifteenth Amendment
Question #11
What was the Supreme Court's justification in Brown v. Board of Education?
A.
The quality of life for African Americans in the South had deteriorated considerably since the adoption of the separate-but-equal doctrine.
B.
The Supreme Court did not have all of the facts when it adopted the separate-but-equal doctrine.
C.
The separate-but-equal doctrine was never intended to apply to people.
D.
School segregation violated the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of equal protection.
Question #12
Which of the following does the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ban?
A.
racial discrimination in public accommodations
B.
discrimination based on sexual orientation
C.
nonviolent resistance
D.
poll taxes and grandfather clauses
Question #13
When did women across the country achieve the constitutionally guaranteed right to vote?
A.
decades after black males won the right to vote
B.
at the same time that black males won the right to vote
C.
during the Civil War
D.
immediately after the Civil War
Question #14
The Supreme Court's decision in Lawrence v. Texas (2003) primarily enhanced the civil liberties of __________.
A.
Asian Americans
B.
American Indians
C.
gays and lesbians
D.
disabled Americans
Question #15
In Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court determined that __________ were unconstitutional.
A.
Jim Crow laws
B.
grandfather clauses
C.
all forms of affirmative action
D.
racial quotas in university admissions
Question #16
If a group of people were systematically discriminated against in the past, which of the following would constitute an affirmative action policy designed as a remedy to help the members of this group overcome this legacy of discrimination?
A.
requiring that all job applicants have at least two years of prior experience
B.
a college admissions policy that gives preferential treatment to members of the group
C.
a color-blind job application process to give members of this group an equal chance
D.
a hiring policy that favors those with relatives working in government
Question #17
Which of the following affirmative action programs would be a clear violation of the Supreme Court's decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)?
A.
admitting some minority applicants with lower academic achievement than some rejected white applicants
B.
considering how an applicant would contribute to the diversity of the university
C.
setting aside a certain percentage of admissions slots for African American students
D.
considering race as a factor in university admissions decisions
Question #18
What is the status of affirmative action in college admissions after the Supreme Court decisions in the two cases involving the University of Michigan, Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) and Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)?
A.
Affirmative action policies are generally permissible, but they cannot involve race-based quotas or numerical point systems.
B.
Affirmative action policies must ensure that all racial and ethnic groups are represented in accordance with the population of the nation as a whole.
C.
All forms of affirmative action are unconstitutional because they unfairly favor some people over others based on the color of their skin.
D.
Affirmative action policies are assumed to be unconstitutional unless the university can demonstrate the need to promote racial tolerance.
Question #19
Which of the following arguments would most likely be made by an opponent of affirmative action policies?
A.
Diversity helps Americans better understand each other.
B.
Unaddressed past discrimination causes perpetual inequality.
C.
Discrimination is a natural part of the human experience.
D.
Affirmative action discriminates on the basis of race.
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ Political Science 1 - Government of the United States and California ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here