BUSAD 120 - Business Law » Fall 2021 » Chapter 2 Quiz
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ BUSAD 120 - Business Law ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here
Question #1
Speech can be subject to reasonable restrictions.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #2
Political speech by corporations falls within the protection of the First Amendment.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #3
The commerce clause has had no greater impact on business than any other provision in the Constitution.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #4
Corporations enjoy many of the same rights and privileges as natural persons do.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #5
Equal protection means that the government must treat all individuals the same.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #6
The national government has the implied power to undertake actions necessary to carry out its expressly designated powers.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #7
If a restriction imposed on speech by the government is content neutral, then a court will not allow it.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #8
The free exercise clause prohibits the government from passing laws that have any impact on religion.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #9
A resident of one state, when in another state, can be denied the privileges and immunities of that state for any reason.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #10
Procedural due process focuses on the content of legislation.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #11
A law that that limits a fundamental right may be held to violate substantive due process.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #12
The dormant commerce clause comes into play when state regulations affect interstate commerce.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #13
Substantive due process requires that a person have an opportunity to object to a proposed action before a fair, neutral decision maker.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #14
In situations involving fundamental rights, a law that rationally relates to a legitimate government end will be struck down.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #15
Preemption occurs when Congress chooses to act exclusively on a subject over which the federal government shares power with the states.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #16
A state may not restrict certain kinds of advertising, even in the interest of preventing consumers from being misled.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #17
The rights secured by the Bill of Rights are absolute.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #18
State regulatory powers are often referred to as police powers.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #19
A law based on a suspect trait will not stand under the equal protection clause even if it is necessary to promote a compelling government interest.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #20
When religious practices work against public policy, the government can act.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #21
Under the full faith and credit clause, any judicial decision in one state with respect to contract rights will be honored and enforced in all states.
A.
FALSE
B.
TRUE
Question #22
Only Congress may pass a law in conflict with the Constitution.
A.
TRUE
B.
FALSE
Question #23
Under the First Amendment, in comparison with commercial speech, the protection given obscene speech is
A.
not as extensive.
B.
more extensive.
C.
equally extensive.
D.
non-existent.
Question #24
A statute enacted by the Wyoming state legislature to regulate trucking affects interstate commerce. In evaluating this statute, the courts will weigh the burden that it imposes on interstate commerce against
A.
the purpose of interstate commerce.
B.
the state’s interest in regulating the matter.
C.
the statute’s impact on noneconomic activity.
D.
the federal government’s authority to regulate the matter.
Question #25
NatGas Corporation obtains a federal license to operate a gas pipeline through a certain area of Oregon. The Oregon state legislature enacts a law that bans gas pipelines in that area. Most likely, the state law violates
A.
no provision in the U.S. Constitution.
B.
the due process clause.
C.
the supremacy clause.
D.
the commerce clause.
Question #26
Book Stop, a bookstore in Capital City, sells publications that criticize government actions and policies. The city enacts an ordinance prohibiting the sale of such materials in the interest of preserving public tranquility. This ordinance is most likely
A.
constitutional under the First Amendment.
B.
an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
C.
a violation of corporations’ rights to certain privileges.
D.
an invalid invasion of individuals’ privacy.
Question #27
Mind Games Inc. markets a variety of shooting, fighting, and hunting video games. A state statue is enacted to require all game makers to label any games with an option to kill something as “excessively violent.” A court would likely hold this regulation to be
A.
necessary to protect national interests.
B.
an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
C.
justified by the need to protect individual rights.
D.
constitutional under the First Amendment.
Question #28
Federal regulations concerning medical devices directly conflict with a certain state law. Under the U.S. Constitution, which law takes precedence is determined by
A.
the commerce clause.
B.
the full faith and credit clause.
C.
the supremacy clause.
D.
the privileges and immunities clause.
Question #29
Generally, given the broad language of the Constitution, the line between state and national powers is often determined by
A.
the President.
B.
the courts.
C.
the administrative branch.
D.
Congress.
Question #30
Centre City enacts an ordinance that bans the distribution of all printed materials on city streets. Diners Café opposes the city’s latest “revenue-enhancing” measure—a tax on prepared food sales—and wants to protest by distributing handbills. In Diners’ suit against the city, a court would likely hold the ban on printed materials to be
A.
not subject to the U.S. Constitution.
B.
unconstitutional under the commerce clause.
C.
unconstitutional under the First Amendment.
D.
constitutional under the First Amendment.
Question #31
Utah enacts a statute to ban advertising in “bad taste.” Most likely, a court would hold this statute to be
A.
an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
B.
justified by the need to protect individual rights.
C.
constitutional under the First Amendment.
D.
necessary to protect national interests.
Question #32
Under the First Amendment, in comparison with noncommercial speech, the protection given commercial ads is
A.
non-existent.
B.
not as extensive.
C.
equally extensive.
D.
more extensive.
Question #33
Under the U.S. Constitution, the federal government has the power to regulate commercial activities among the states. This grant implies that the regulation of such activities is not within the authority of
A.
the President.
B.
the states.
C.
the courts.
D.
Congress.
Question #34
Pat stands in front of Rogue’s Tavern, shouting “fighting words” that are likely to incite Rogue’s patrons to respond violently. The First Amendment protects such speech
A.
none of the time.
B.
all of the time.
C.
only if it is noncommercial.
D.
only if it is symbolic.
Question #35
To reduce traffic, Market Town enacts an ordinance that allows only a few specific street vendors to operate in certain areas. A court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of
A.
interstate commerce.
B.
free speech.
C.
free exercise.
D.
equal protection.
Question #36
Congress enacts the Ad Restriction Act (ARA) to limit advertising in certain circumstances. The ARA will be considered valid if it directly advances a substantial government interest
A.
and goes further than necessary to ensure full coverage.
B.
and the parties affected by it can elect how “far” to go in applying it.
C.
without regard to how “far” it goes.
D.
and goes no further than necessary to achieve its objective.
Question #37
A.
free speech.
B.
free exercise.
C.
privileges and immunities.
D.
privacy.
Question #38
Pharma Corporation expresses opinions on political issues through its financial contributions to political action committees and other groups. Under the First Amendment, Pharma’s “expression” is most likely
A.
protected.
B.
discouraged.
C.
prescribed.
D.
prohibited.
Question #39
River City enacts an ordinance that prohibits all advertising on the sides of trucks. A court would likely review this ordinance under the principles of
A.
interstate commerce.
B.
due process
C.
equal protection.
D.
free exercise.
Question #40
Metro City enacts an ordinance that bans the use of “sound amplifying systems” on public streets. Niles wants to campaign for a seat on the city council by broadcasting his message through speakers mounted on a truck. In Niles’s suit against the city, a court would likely hold the ordinance to be
A.
constitutional under the First Amendment.
B.
an unconstitutional restriction of speech.
C.
necessary to protect national interests.
D.
justified by the need to protect individual rights.
Need help with your exam preparation?
Get Answers to this exam for $6 USD.
Get Answers to all exams in [ BUSAD 120 - Business Law ] course for $25 USD.
Existing Quiz Clients Login here