Identify the different approach to the study of religion: assumes that the divine is real and that religion is a response or approach to spiritual realities, assumes that at least one religion is true

Identify the different approach to the study of religion: attempts to understand the origins of religion and to explain religion in terms of its significance and function in society, typically explaining or describing religion in non-religious terms (e.g. in terms of psychology or sociology)

Identify the different approach to the study of religion: accepts religion as an enduring human phenomenon, which can be studied and appreciated as a phenomenon, on its own terms, without seeking to explain its origins nor judge as to whether it is true or false

Identify the theory of religion with the thinker who held it: argued that the sacred is simply a symbol of the society, linked religion with society as a "mirror" of the society; authored the book The Elementary Forms of Religious Life

Identify the theory of religion with the thinker who held it: was an atheist who viewed religion as an "outward manifestation of basic psychological causes," considered religion to be an illusion, a form of "wish fulfillment" and a projection of neuroses; authored several books exploring the nature of religion, including Totem and Taboo

Identify the theory of religion with the thinker who held it: saw God or "the Holy" as the reality that stands beyond and behind what we call "religion," identified this "Holy" as numinous and the "mysterium tremendum fascinans"; authored the book The Idea of the Holy

Identify the theory of religion with the thinker who held it: considered awareness of the sacred to be at the heart of the human religious experience; authored the book The Sacred and the Profane