A.   are "revolutionary."

B.   point to major social and environmental changes.

C.   attack problems that the market economy and national governments aren't addressing/are creating.

D.   all of the above describe NGOs in Latin America.

A.   TRUE

B.   FALSE

A.   Shift so the organization can gain more power.

B.   Reflect the importance of the issue the organization is addressing.

C.   Are indicators of whether positive or detrimental work is being carried out.

D.   Reflect what the organization is capable of.

A.   was the Pre-Columbian education system in Latin America.

B.   was the Pre-Columbian version of the NGO space in society.

C.   governed the Pre-Columbian communal land system.

D.   involved higher taxes on the poorest in Pre-Columbian society.

A.   through the church

B.   through their own charity organizations

C.   through existent Andean Reciprocity systems

D.   they left it to native groups to build

A.   the desire for groups worldwide to contribute to liberation theology movement goals.

B.   the failure of a corrupt Catholic Church to address social and environmental issues.

C.   the effects of corruption between the state and powerful landowners/urban entrepreneurial classes. 

D.   the failure of large development projects and the opening of democracies.

A.   it continued settling the area with no policy change.

B.   it invited the World Wildlife Fund, the Sierra Club, and the Environmental Defense Fund to coordinate development projects.

C.   it funded coffee and cacao production projects.

D.   it decentralized development projects to local NGOs

A.   cacao cultivation

B.   coffee cultivation

C.   soy cultivation

D.   native fruit or palm tree cultivation

A.   Furthered deforestation unintentionally.

B.   Involved the use of a bee species native to the Amazon

C.   Involved the use of non-native bees that didn't need the forest to survive.

D.   Successfully conserved the forest and provided a livelihood for locals.

A.   That business – oriented NGOs and environmental groups like Greenpeace can successfully work together in crafting policy.

B.   The power of local farmer NGOs in crafting environmentally sound farming policy in the area.

C.   That national governments can work effectively and efficiently to conserve the environment.

D.   The power of "jumping scale".