Business 005 - Business Law I » Fall 2022 » Ch 3 Business Law Homework

Need help with your exam preparation?

Question #1
An appellate court will overturn the decision of a trial court that makes an error of law.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #2
An appellate court may elect to hear new evidence in a suit.
A.   TRUE
B.   FALSE
Question #3
The three major stages of litigation are pretrial, trial, and posttrial.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #4
Service of process is the process of obtaining information from an opposing party before trial.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #5
After a defendant finishes introducing his or her evidence, the plaintiff can present a rebuttal.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #6
A jury verdict specifies the amount of the damages to be paid by a losing party.
A.   TRUE
B.   FALSE
Question #7
In most states, if neither party requests a jury, there will be no jury trial.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #8
An affidavit is a set of written questions answered under oath.
A.   TRUE
B.   FALSE
Question #9
A party who files an appeal is known as an appellant.
A.   FALSE
B.   TRUE
Question #10
A judgment may go unpaid.
A.   TRUE
B.   FALSE
Question #11
Glen retains Holly, an attorney, on a contingent-fee basis to seek $100,000 in damages in a personal-injury suit against Interstate Shipping Corporation. Glen wins. He must pay
A.   Holly's fee only.
B.   Holly's fee, court fees, and other expenses.
C.   neither Holly's fee nor court fees and other expenses.
D.   court fees and other expenses, but not Holly's fee.
Question #12
Mac and Nan engage in a business transaction from which a dispute arises. Mac initiates a lawsuit against Nan by filing a complaint. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-1A. The sheriff serves Nan with a summons. If Nan chooses to ignore it
A.   Mac must file an amended complaint.
B.   Mac will have a judgment entered in his favor.
C.   Nan will have a judgment entered in her favor.
D.   Nan must be served with a second summons.
Question #13
Diners Corporation files a suit against Eateries, Inc.Refer to Fact Pattern 3-2A. During the trial, Diners' attorney questions the plaintiff's witness Floyd. This is
A.   an interrogatory.
B.   a direct examination.
C.   a cross-examination.
D.   a request for admissions.
Question #14
Diners Corporation files a suit against Eateries, Inc. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-2A. The attorney for Eateries also questions Floyd. This is
A.   a direct examination.
B.   a cross-examination.
C.   an interrogatory.
D.   a request for admissions.
Question #15
Liz files a suit against Moe in a state court. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-3A. If Moe decides to appeal to a state appellate court, Moe's attorney must file, with the clerk of the trial court within a prescribed period of time
A.   a notice of appeal.
B.   a transcript of the trial and copies of the exhibits.
C.   a formal refusal to abide by the verdict.
D.   the judgment order from which the appeal is taken.
Question #16
Liz files a suit against Moe in a state court. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-3A. If Liz decides to appeal to a state appellate court, Liz's attorney must file, with the clerk of the appellate court within a prescribed period of time
A.   a notice of appeal.
B.   a motion for a judgment n.o.v.
C.   a request for affirmance, remand, or reversal.
D.   a demand to be heard.
Question #17
Liz files a suit against Moe in a state court. The case proceeds to trial, after which the court renders a verdict. Refer to Fact Pattern 3-3A. If Moe appeals to, and files a brief with, a state appellate court, Liz's attorney may file within a prescribed period of time
A.   an answering brief.
B.   a responding motion for judgment on the brief.
C.   a request for a deposition.
D.   an advisory interrogatory.
Question #18
Kyle files a suit against Lora. The document that informs Lora that she is required to respond is
A.   the answer.
B.   the complaint.
C.   the summons.
D.   the service of process.
Question #19
Real Cleen Laundry, Inc., files a suit against Sudsee Soap Company and seeks, as part of discovery, certain documents in Sudsee's possession. A legitimate reason for this request is that the documents contain
A.   private information that should be made public.
B.   public information in its most convenient form.
C.   proof that Sudsee needs to defend against the suit.
D.   proof that Real Cleen needs to establish its case.
Question #20
Toppers, Inc., files a suit against Unique Hat Company. Toppers's attorney calls Vicky, the first witness, and questions her. This questioning is
A.   direct examination.
B.   cross-examination.
C.   recross-examination.
D.   redirect examination.

Need help with your exam preparation?